Does Your Favorite Movie Pass the Test?

A few weeks ago, I read a blogger's movie review which mentioned the "Bechdel test." I had never heard of this test before, but once I learned what it was, it changed the way I look at film and television as a woman. The Bechdel Test is an informal test popularized by a comic by Alison Bechdel. You can see the original strip here. Basically, a media text passes the Bechdel test if it meets the following criteria:

  1. It has to have at least two women in it,
  2. Who talk to each other,
  3. About something besides a man.

This didn't seem like it should be a hard test to pass. After all, the total female population in the U.S. is slightly higher than the male population, at least as of last year, and most people have several women that they consider important parts of their lives (mothers, sisters, daughters, significant others, bosses, co-workers, friends, enemies, etc.). Surely it must take at least two female characters to tell most stories. Surely the women in these stories would have more to talk about than just members of the opposite sex. As I thought through my list of favorite movies, however, I saw just how many of the films I love failed this simple test. Out of my top three favorite movies (Speed Racer, The Life Aquatic, and The Ring), only one of them passed (The Ring), and it was the only one with a female protagonist.

 

Since I learned of the Test, my husband and I have analyzed every movie, TV show episode, and video game we've experienced together to see whether or not it passes, and the results have been really thought-provoking. A small website has even developed around the test, with a list of movies and their Bechdel grade, detailing which aspects of the test they pass and fail. It's easy to go through the list and only take notice of the films that didn't pass, while a large number of them actually did pass. But to see so many films with the red stop sign symbol, meaning there were less than two women in the film, is extremely disheartening.

 

So the big question is why. Why are women so underrepresented in movies? Why are women often only utilized to promote male characters in movies? We make up half of the country's population, we go see movies, we love to see characters that we can relate to, and we certainly don't just talk about men all the time. Why is the female protagonist so rare, and the significant female supporting character nearly as rare?

 

The Bechdel Test website links to an article with one explanation: Jennifer Kesler explains in her article for The Hathor Legacy that her professors and peers in film school criticized many of her screenplays for their abundance of female characters having conversations about subjects other than men. Their reasoning? “The audience doesn’t want to listen to a bunch of women talking about whatever it is women talk about," Jessica recounts, regardless of the fact that these conversations in her screenplays served to advance the plot. Jessica goes on to argue that this teaching is terribly outdated and is not applicable to the modern generation of movie-goers, who are taught that women are equals. "We had a whole generation too young to remember why we needed second wave feminism, for cryin’ out loud, and here we were adhering to rules from the 1950s."

 

So next time you watch a movie or television show, think about what you just saw and how it represented women. Give it the Bechdel Test, and if it fails, think about how you, as a consumer, can express your dissatisfaction to the studio. Consider telling your friends, male and female, that this media text doesn't pass such a simple test (perhaps influencing their decision to watch it or not), adding the text to the list on the Bechdel Test website, or "voting" with your dollars should the opportunity to see the program again or buy the DVD arise.

 

4
 
 

Comments

What an interesting test!

Now that I think about it, a lot of my favorite movies do not have more than 1 female talking to each other about something other than men. Even if I were to write a screenplay, I might not put something like that (unless the movie revolves around a group of women) unless I deliberately put it in to make some point..That's really interesting, because I would be rather sad if women were underrepresented, yet I myself am not particular about conversations between women in a movie. Maybe it's because I am not really concerned too much about women underrepresentation, or at least I don't think so much about it. All that said, the pattern that you found in the Bechdel Test is incredibly interesting...but I don't think it's something to be so concerned about...it's just a pattern, and an interesting one at that. But, I would not mind watching a movie with more than 1 female talking to each other about something other than men, and see how different of a movie it will come out to be from a lot of the other movies we watch.

The thing is, if filmmakers

The thing is, if filmmakers are being taught specifically not to include multiple female characters with rich conversations, and are berated when they do so, that's no longer just a "pattern."  That's suppression, and that is something to be concerned about.  You can look at our government and say, "Oh there are only two women in the supreme court, and there has never been a female president, it's just an interesting pattern, it doesn't matter that women are underrepresented in the governement," but the truth is that our soceity has purposefully kept women out of these positions for a very long time, something that is only just beginning to change.  And when the government is making decisions about women's rights and other issues that affect women, women absolutely need to be represented.
 
It's well known how much of an influence media has on our society.  We consume media constantly, and it's one of the largest shapers of our world view.  As a result, many women already struggle with an unrealistic standard of beauty promoted by the media, as well as other issues like the importance of being feminine, and a woman's role in relationships, families, and the work place.  We've come a long way from women being expected to stay home in the kitchen, but we still have a long way to go as well.  If women are rarely portrayed as strong, important characters that are vital to these media narratives, what kind of message does that send to men and women about the importance of women in their life's narrative?  And if the only female role models in media available to our children are the Disney princesses, and all they can seem to talk about is waiting for their Prince Charming, how is that going to teach them values of self-worth, independence, and value in our society?
 
My husband, brother-in-law, and I saw the new Alice in Wonderland movie this weekend.  The main character was a strong woman, the main villain was a strong female character, and handful of supporting characters were females as well.  If you include the characters in the "real life" sections of the film, the male characters are actually outnumbered. Alice talks to these other women about her identity, her feelings, her doubts, her values.  My husband and brother-in-law both enjoyed the movie very much, even though those women rarely talked about anything besides their own, men-not-required agendas.  This idea that audiences won't pay to watch women be themselves and important is completely archaic and needs to be done away with.  I'd love to see the day when filmmakers are given free reign to write rich narratives that include a wide variety of characters, including ones that I can relate to.